Saturday, August 30, 2008

Decision Making

This afternoon, I was reading through the book Intoduction to Type and Decision Making, published by CPP, Inc., which is a part of the Introduction to Type Series. I found the following information to be interesting and fun:

Descision-Making Styles:

  • ISTJ - Wht is the most traditional choice?
  • ISTP - What is the most pragmatic choice?
  • ESTP - What is the most expedient choice?
  • ESTJ - What is the most sensible choice?
  • ISFJ - What is the most conscientious choice?
  • ISFP - What is the most harmonious choice?
  • ESFP - What is the most enjoyable choice?
  • ESFJ - What is the most supportive choice?
  • INFJ - What is the most inspiring choice?
  • INFP - What is the most caring choice?
  • ENFP - What is the most exciting choice?
  • ENFJ - What is the most collaborative choice?
  • INTJ - What is the most pioneering choice?
  • INTP - What is the most logical choice?
  • ENTP - What is the most intriguing choice?
  • ENTJ - What is the most effective choice?


2 comments:

  1. AFTER-THOUGHT: Let's keep in mind that we should ask all of these questions when making a sound decision. This is just showing what can enter our mind first when faced with making a decision. When we are balanced, we can adjust the way we perceive information, as well as how we make decisions, according to the situation at hand. Type is not a box. Type is not a box. Type is not a box.

    MBTI is meant to be just a guideline and a starting point, a tool, to look at ourselves in a more pragmatic way.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hmmmm.... Let me rephrase that. I have this chronic phobia about people getting misinformed. When I said we can adjust our perception and judgment, I meant that we can use our non-preferred functions when the situation calls for them.

    We often do do that. We do do that... (haha) We also make a boo boo while doing that. We can only do it so so... Makes us feel like we're going loo loo.

    Oops.. back to what I was saying... Yes, we can use our non-preferred functions. It just takes more energy to do so.

    ReplyDelete